| Early bridge domination - allowed? | |
|
+3DevilDog shuAYRE KodoHunter 7 posters |
Author | Message |
---|
KodoHunter
Posts : 9 Join date : 2013-08-17 Age : 29 Location : Finland
| Subject: Early bridge domination - allowed? Sun Aug 25, 2013 12:48 pm | |
| Hey So here's the case, today in a game got invis pots & golem as early drop. Decided to go for a quick kill to gain advantage on the down line with the golem. Well, the kill failed (5hp left on red, damn lucker), so decided to take control of the enemy bridge. As a result, red had to go in his first duel at level 5, losing it completely for them. Jason, however, claimed that this method I used was considered 'blocking the bridge', and therefore bannable. I don't think the rules have a clear point for this kind of cases, so can this be considered an illegal move or not? | |
|
| |
shuAYRE Shaman
Posts : 32 Join date : 2013-07-18 Location : Los Angeles, Ca
| Subject: Re: Early bridge domination - allowed? Sun Aug 25, 2013 3:39 pm | |
| It is NOT bannable and seems completely fine to me. No lvl50 creep pulling, no blocking bridges, You just owned the lane that's all. | |
|
| |
DevilDog Chieftan
Posts : 47 Join date : 2013-07-17 Age : 32 Location : Baltimore, MD
| Subject: Re: Early bridge domination - allowed? Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:13 pm | |
| It's not bannable, and if you have any issues with a ban because of this come see me. | |
|
| |
AllUsedUp
Posts : 79 Join date : 2013-07-26 Age : 36 Location : Ohio
| Subject: Re: Early bridge domination - allowed? Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:36 am | |
| anyone else notice his map is free of the dark fog of war as if he has been to those areas already? at lvl 10 I highly doubt it. | |
|
| |
Mox_Demon
Posts : 19 Join date : 2013-07-18 Age : 40 Location : Detroit
| Subject: Re: Early bridge domination - allowed? Mon Aug 26, 2013 12:33 pm | |
| - AllUsedUp wrote:
- anyone else notice his map is free of the dark fog of war as if he has been to those areas already? at lvl 10 I highly doubt it.
It's a replay. Also that's some good playing there, nice strategy. I hate how everyone's scared of ban for playing good. | |
|
| |
Duckanator_4000
Posts : 23 Join date : 2013-07-21 Age : 27 Location : Australia
| Subject: Re: Early bridge domination - allowed? Thu Aug 29, 2013 5:58 am | |
| lol allusedup it's a replay and he has fog of war off, but if theat happens you could just tp to the tower and kite the creeps around the tower? | |
|
| |
KodoHunter
Posts : 9 Join date : 2013-08-17 Age : 29 Location : Finland
| Subject: Re: Early bridge domination - allowed? Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:54 pm | |
| - Duckanator_4000 wrote:
- lol allusedup it's a replay and he has fog of war off, but if theat happens you could just tp to the tower and kite the creeps around the tower?
No, he can't really tp to the tower, since it's a suicide. Or would you go to the backlines with an 800hp hero against a golem with 500dmg stun? Thanks for the answers though, just wanted to be sure. | |
|
| |
Kyp Grunt
Posts : 20 Join date : 2013-07-18
| Subject: Re: Early bridge domination - allowed? Sun Sep 01, 2013 6:44 pm | |
| Damn I learned that if you get wolves or golem before first wave of creeps set out for a battle it is unwise to keep those items for duels even if you are a weak hero. Better go to the mid and unleash PURE F*CKING HELL!!! | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Early bridge domination - allowed? | |
| |
|
| |
| Early bridge domination - allowed? | |
|